วันพุธที่ 18 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Ne Zha: The Guardian God in Chinese Legend

 

Ne Zha is one of the most famous gods in Chinese legend. There are many stories about his birth and role in protecting the world from evil forces. Ne Zha is considered a symbol of bravery, fighting for justice, and standing up for the right cause. His significance continues to have a profound influence on Chinese culture today.

In this article, we will introduce Ne Zha, from birth to his role in protecting the world, and the concepts of bravery and protection in Chinese mythology.


Ne Zha’s Birth

According to Chinese legend, Ne Zha was born from a pregnancy that had never occurred before. While his mother was pregnant unnaturally, his body was formed from a crystal ball and fire conjured by a high god. Ne Zha’s birth differed from a normal human birth, making his appearance symbolic of his specialness and power in the world.

Ne Zha has a remarkable appearance. He is often depicted as a young man holding various weapons and possessing strength surpassing that of a normal human. Another notable feature is his ability to travel both in the sky and on Earth at high speeds. He is also highly skilled in magic and shape-shifting.

Ne Zha’s Protection of the World

The God Nezha plays a significant role in protecting the world from evil forces and demons. He has shown bravery in fighting against many powerful enemies, mainly when Nezha fought a demon who attempted to destroy the world’s peace. In one famous legend, he used his power to help protect the world from the attacks of evil demons.

Significance of Nezha in Chinese Culture

Nezha plays a significant role in reflecting important Chinese beliefs and values, such as bravery, justice, and fighting for good. Praising Nezha in rituals and festivals is common in many regions of China. There have also been popular movies and shows about Nezha.

Associations with Deities in Chinese Mythology

Nezha is not only a powerful deity who protects the world, but many other deities play important roles in the Chinese universe, such as the God of the Universe, the God of Wealth, and the God of Justice, all of whom play a role in maintaining the balance of the world and the universe.

• Religious Beliefs

In Chinese culture, Nezha plays a supporting role in Buddhism and Taoism and is worshipped as a symbol of mental stability and fighting against evil.

• Nezha in the Modern World

Today, Nezha continues to be widely recognized both in China and around the world. His popularity is not limited to religious circles but also in the entertainment industry, such as movies, comics, and games with stories about Nezha.

Challenges and growth of Nezha

The changes in the world and how Nezha is perceived today reflect his challenges. Over time, Nezha’s power is not limited to protecting the world from external enemies but also faces changes in social values ​​and interpretations.

Adapting to the modern era

In the present era, Nezha inspires people to be aware of the struggle for justice in their daily lives, such as standing up for what is right, fighting against social injustice, and maintaining peace in a world full of conflict.

Nezha and education and inspiration

Nezha is also a good example of promoting educational values, especially learning about the power of fighting and defending what is right. The symbol of Nezha is a powerful tool that inspires the younger generation to feel involved in creating and protecting society.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

วันจันทร์ที่ 16 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Chang'e, the Moon Goddess in Chinese Legend

 


Chang'e, the Moon Goddess in Chinese Legend

The legend of Chang'e, the Moon Goddess, is one of the most profound and fascinating stories in Chinese culture, and it has been around for thousands of years. This legend is not only widely known in China but has also had a profound influence on Asian and Western cultures. Chang'e is said to be a goddess who lives on the moon with the jade rabbit and is the origin of China’s important Mid-Autumn Festival.


The Origin of the Legend of Chang'e

Chang'e is a legend that dates back to ancient times during the Zhou Dynasty. Many versions of the story relate to her, but the most popular origin is a story of love and sacrifice.


The Love Legend Between Chang'e and Hou Yi

Hou Yi was a skilled archer sent to save the world from the Ten Suns burning the earth. After completing his mission, the gods gave him the elixir of life, but this medicine became the beginning of a tragedy.

- Chang'e's Sacrifice: It is said that Chang'e drank the elixir of life to protect it from falling into the wrong hands.

- Journey to the Moon: After drinking the medicine, she became immortal and floated to the moon. Leaving Hou Yi Behind


Chang'e's Role in Chinese Culture

Chang'e is not just a legendary goddess; she has also influenced Chinese traditions, culture, and art.


Mid-Autumn Festival

The Mid-Autumn Festival is an important Chinese festival celebrated on the night of a beautiful full moon.

- Goddess Worship: People believe that Chang'e brings blessings of happiness and fertility.

- Offerings: Mooncakes and seasonal fruits.


Chang'e in Art and Literature

The legend of Chang'e has inspired modern poetry, paintings, and even movies.

- Ancient Poetry: Many poems refer to Chang'e as a symbol of beauty and sadness.

- Movies and TV series: Her legend has been adapted into famous movies and TV series, such as Over the Moon.


Chang'e's Symbolism and Meaning

Chang'e is not just a legendary character but also a symbol of various meanings in Chinese culture.


Beauty and Innocence

Chang'e is seen as the embodiment of perfect beauty and purity.


Love and Sacrifice

The story of Chang'e and Hou Yi symbolizes love and sacrifice.


Jade Rabbit

The jade rabbit that stands beside Chang'e symbolizes hope and fertility.

- The jade rabbit is said to grind herbs to make the elixir of life.

- It represents loyalty.


Chang'e and modern culture

In modern times, the legend of Chang'e still plays a vital role in contemporary culture and media.


Technology and lunar exploration projects

China named the lunar probe "Chang'e" in honor of this legend.

The legend inspired the Chang'e-1 to Chang'e-5 probes.

Representing the fusion of science and culture.


Popularities in video games and animation

Chang'e has appeared in unique video games and animations.

Famous games featuring Chang'e include Smite.

The animated film Over the Moon was inspired by the legend.


Conclusion

The legend of Chang'e, the goddess of the moon, is one of the most inspiring and profoundly reflecting stories of Chinese culture. It is a beautiful legend and connects with modern traditions, culture, and modernity.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

วันอาทิตย์ที่ 15 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Don’t find a reason for him to leave.

 



It’s challenging to conclude a relationship between two people correctly. The best thing about this love article is that if we’re not meant for someone, we want to say, “Don’t find a reason for him to leave.”


Many couples are unsuccessful and unfulfilled and have different forms and factors. Some have been together for a long time, some haven’t, some have shown signs of it before, and some have left unexpectedly. But when the relationship ends, one party usually “doesn’t want” or wants the other party to leave.


I believe that those who are not ready to end the relationship will have questions or want to know the “reason” why he broke up with us or left us. “Why?” Even though there are initial reasons to know or see, such as that he has someone else, it’s still a question of why he went to see someone else. Or what’s wrong with us? Why did he do that? Did he decide like that?


The dividing line is between those who accept and those who can’t take it. Because those who can accept it probably don’t want to ask about the reason. Knowing that he has shown his intentions, we must accept it because we can’t force it. Or if we’re suspicious and the other party gives a reason, we will take it willingly because we know we can’t change anything.


However, the problem will be with those who “can’t accept it,” regardless of the reason. No matter what he answers, he tends not to accept it anyway. Starting from arguing that it is not valid, or even if it is true, secretly resisting by bringing up other things to compare, such as “You are not good either” or “Have you never seen any other good things about me?” If you review it, it is entirely different from what he wants, to the point that he is no longer satisfied with it. Therefore, arguing or disagreeing will never help. At most, it is a bargaining for a chance to extend the time.


Especially in cases where the other party is not clear about the reasons, it will cause us, the ones who do not accept, to have thoughts that go round and round, such as what is not good? What is wrong? Why has he changed? What makes him not the same? It is like trying to find a reason that looks like we are trying to find a way to prevent the rain from falling or asking why the rain must fall until the clothes we hung to dry are wet. The point is that the clothes are already soaked. We can’t do anything about what has already happened. Many of us already know why, but we don’t accept it. On the other hand, it is unreasonable because what happened was not real. Or if he truly loves us, he did not like us from the beginning, whether he is aware of it or not.


Therefore, when someone is going to leave, if we try to find a reason for him to leave, all we will get is negative results because it will make us, who cannot accept it, go around and round and cannot accept it even more. It would be better to change the reason why he left; why don’t we move on or stay where we are? For what? What do we gain? Since he’s gone.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

วันเสาร์ที่ 14 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Time to go to the bench

 


Unexpected obstacles and problems are taboo for those who have goals. No one wants to stumble or lose along the way. But sometimes life is like a sport that must be played more than once. It is very difficult to win every time you compete.


It is not just the current situation that makes me write this perspective often. But for many people who have goals to do something and are about to be disappointed or face major obstacles, it can happen to everyone.


In team sports, key athletes must be present. If they are missing or cannot compete, it will negatively or significantly reduce the chance of winning. But often, the coach or team manager has to decide not to send them to compete, even if they want to win that game.


The main reason is the team’s “long-term goal.” When the coach or team manager does not send key athletes to compete, it does not mean that they do not want to win or that their determination is reduced. It is to keep them warm and give them a rest. Even in the second half, there are techniques.


There may be many negative results if you force them to compete in every game. Physical fatigue, pressure, loss of motivation, or loss of creativity in the game. It is all possible.


For “us” who are determined, when there are endless obstacles “in many waves,” it is similar to a sport where we have to compete to win too often. Sometimes, it is time to stop and go to the “substitute bench.” Otherwise, it is no different. We may win this match, but many matches may have negative effects if we are unlucky, get injured, lose form, or are under too much pressure. And that is not worth it.


“Can’t stop because there is no one else?”

There may be times when we feel like we can’t rest because the team has no one to substitute for us. In this case, we have to play with an understanding of our own condition. This match this match, we play to support the team. The important thing is to make our body and mind better, ready to move forward and set our intentions again in other matches or in the future that we have to progress.


We must remember that in sports, coaches and team managers think for or guide us. But we have to be mindful and make decisions for ourselves. If we are exhausted and can’t think of anything, we cannot compete. It is time to go to the substitute bench. There is no disadvantage in taking a break and watching other people’s games. It may provide us with another channel and new ideas.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

Always Moral, Always Giving

 This article in the category of love and couples is not a Dharma article or will speak in terms of any religion. It just has the angle that “moral” and “giving” may make married life-love life go well. It talks about it in a way that is not related to merit, sin, or goodness but is the nature of the relationship of couples who are always Moral and always giving.


We may have heard the word “always Moral, always giving,” but for some reason, I am more familiar with the word “always Moral, always giving” (have you ever heard it? Please tell me). Both have the same meaning… So, what do the words “always Moral” and “always Giving” have to do with love?


Starting with “moral” here, it simply means a specific behavior that is a regular practice. It is not something that is done once in a while. For example, if you normally speak rudely but speak politely some days, this is definitely not Moral…


The word “giving” here means giving (not eating :p ), which is not just “giving.” It means being willing or sacrificing to give. Therefore, it can be called giving alms, which, from one perspective, must not be biased against the word giving in the form of only a higher person giving to a lower person. That does not seem like a good thing. If we understand a little, think about it a little, we will understand.


Therefore, the interpretation in this article is that “equal morality” means people with similar behaviors or conduct of life. It can be any morality or way of life. And “equal giving” means a couple who give equally, which includes “giving” to each other. When combining these two things, it will be seen how the couple’s behavior and giving are given to each other. Or to summarize again, “how do they behave with each other?”


For example, in a couple where the man likes to drink, it is wrong if we only stick to the word morality, as in the Dhamma. However, a good or bad married life depends on whether they are equal. The man drinks, but the woman likes it so they can go together. Or if she does not drink, but in her opinion, she sees this as usual and not a problem, then it can go together. In this way, equal morality.


However, if the man is a drinker, but the woman does not like it, the more problems there will be because morality is not equal. This is a simple foundation. Now, if we say that Some things if we do the same thing, won’t it be bad? Like this, both like to drink. When drunk, won’t we fight each other? Will there be more problems? This needs to be considered further because it is another precept (another practice). For example, one party is drunk and sleeps, but the other party is intoxicated and causes a commotion. This is not considered a precept that is agreed upon because the party who is drunk and sleeps probably doesn’t understand why he has to cause a commotion, why he doesn’t sleep! It isn’t easy to be together. It is considered that the precepts are not equal.


Equal does not mean that they have to be the same.


But equal precepts mean just acting the same. In the original example, even though the woman did not like or was not satisfied with the man being a drinker, at one point, she thought, “I can accept it,” and backed off. This is like “giving." In this case, the couple’s life can continue. However, if the man exceeds the limits of “willingness to give,” such as before, even though he was a drinker but did not interfere with work, later on, he starts to interfere with work, the other party will not be satisfied. It is considered beyond willingness.


“Always giving” does not mean you have to give similarly. When the woman accepts the man being a drinker, even though she does not drink, she must also feel that she has received other kinds of sacrifice from the man. Because if one side always has to give in, you can imagine what it will be like one day. Because people may be willing to give more than others for a period of time. “When time passes, if you don’t receive anything back, what you give will become worthless every day." When that day comes, you won’t eat the same.


Equal does not mean equal in quantity.


In fact, one important thing is the word “equal.” And equal does not mean equal in quantity or countable, even in “our feelings.” Because giving something, the value to the receiver is difficult to measure. For example, if we give 100 baht to 2 people, each person will be grateful or see the value differently. Therefore, even the giver will not know how much the receiver sees the value..


That’s why many people wonder about some couples. It’s like one person is so good, the other seems to be a loser. Why can they stay together for so long? It’s because they may not be suitable for anyone except their people. Or the other person sees something in them that other people don’t necessarily understand or receive because they are outsiders.


But there is another form: people who don’t see their own worth or see themselves as not deserving of anything better. Outsiders see that “He should be better than that.” But he himself will see that he is “equal” to him, which is appropriate, so he can stay with someone who is useless.


However, if one day he sees something change, develops himself, has a better perspective, and becomes more confident in himself, morality and behavior will change, giving and acceptance will change, and they may not be equal anymore.


Or in the type that endures, expects good things that the other person will give, or hopes that he will improve, including returning to being suitable as before. This is not equal from the beginning but is expected to be equal only. If the other person does not change, it will probably separate and break up one day sooner or later.


And equality does not necessarily have to be achieved from the first day.


Finally, if we agree or understand that morality is equal, giving is equal here; it is unnecessary to give to each other from the beginning. It is also possible that we may meet someone who does not know themselves, does not know enough, that is, morality is not stable, giving is lacking, speaking generally, it is a fickle person, acting restlessly, life is not stable, and has not found their own needs. In this case, people who do not know enough are problematic for morality, giving to be equal to us or anyone else. How can it be equal when they are still swinging back and forth today?


However, Ultimately, people change, more or less. At this point, we can conclude that if two people “accept and forgive each other, adjust to each other,” they will eventually be equal and can stay together for a long time.


Today, How we treat each other, how much we give each other, and how much we accept each other. And it is not just one side. That is the origin of always giving, always giving. It may not be today, it may not be this person, it may not be him and me. Anyway, I hope you find that person.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 12 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Use money to solve problems?

 “Why can’t you do it? Do you have money?” This question sounded annoying in a meeting a long time ago. The speaker intentionally threw that sentence at me directly.

Hearing it, I developed a particular attitude toward money: It doesn’t make sense to use money all the time. This reflects inequality. And can money solve every problem?

“Do you have money? Could you give it to me? I’ll show you.” He kept talking and used a sentence that made me feel annoyed. Even though I wasn’t that old then, I could still control my temper. Or maybe it was because he was much older. Anyway, I was lucky that it was like that. After that, he continued talking until I understood the elder wasn’t trying to annoy me but wanted me to change my attitude. I was lucky that I got past his attitude and gained some insights until today...

Using money to solve problems

While I was frowning during that conversation, the following sentence was still a question like “Is it true?” If you have money, you can do that thing. It can solve the problem. When there were many questions, I thought back and realized it was true. If you have money, you can solve those problems. With various procurements, it is only worth it or not.

If money can solve the problem, we should stop saying, “It’s impossible” or “Can’t be done,” closing off our attempts to solve it.

Of course, there may be better solutions than money because some things can be solved but may have to be expensive. The point is, if we have an attitude that cuts money out of the process just because we think like “people with no money,” we will lack specific perspectives and methods...

Let’s give a simple example: We are just students with no income and a low-income family. We have to do a project to submit to the teacher. Our idea has some components that require a photo of you driving an expensive sports car. The precise first thing is that we probably don’t have money to buy a sports car. Even if we can buy it, we will need more than just taking a photo.

The next option is to rent. But with our status, renting is still too expensive. In this case, it will be impossible not to do it.

When we read, we may have an attitude of “possibility” (because it is not our problem) and think that we should use that method. But in reality, many times, when we think that we “have no money,” we may immediately “give up” on the idea of ​​doing something. In this case, it would be not taking pictures with sports cars anymore…

Money can solve problems, but if there is no money…

In many cases, the factors may be more complicated or have a “process” than the simple example I gave. If we try to think “with money” first, in the sense that if we have money, we will buy that thing, hire someone to do this, and see the possibility of what we need to do to succeed in that matter first. Now, when there is not enough money, or it is not worth it, we gradually cut out parts by parts. Some things can be rented instead of bought, some things can be borrowed or rented, or instead of hiring someone, we can ask for help from friends or relatives, solving the problems individually. Many things are possible.

If we have an attitude of possibility first, the ideas will flow continuously and not be difficult. It is like not having money to rent a sports car. Some people think that they can edit the photos. They can hire someone if they do not know how to edit or are afraid that it will not be realistic. It should be cheaper than renting a car. And if hiring someone to edit to make it realistic is still expensive (Money again), The solution might be to use your status as a student to ask for a showroom. How about you ask to work with someone who rents a car for photography in exchange for a sneaky photo session?

I came up with this idea because I tried to think in a possible way. But in the end, if that matter only requires money, at least I know how much more money I have to save to make it successful. I have also found a way to use the least amount of money. But it’s not like it’s “impossible” or “impossible.”

Many people who have read this may think that if we have ideas and thoughts, we can solve the problem. If we look at it superficially and don’t connect, this matter is undoubtedly the case. But from a particular perspective, many people don’t think in a way that “breaks down the problem into small pieces” or are in a state of “discouragement.” When they see a problem, they want to conclude, end it, and run away. This attitude or thought process is essential. Even if we face that problem and are in a financial crisis, we may not want to think or feel like thinking about creative ideas.

Money can’t solve every problem, but...

This article doesn’t talk about using money to solve real problems. But we must admit that if we think about it for fun, money can solve many problems if we have enough. But if you ask, can money hit anyone’s head? The answer is no, it can’t be done. But from what I have written, not having cash hits us in the head, making us have a distorted attitude. Even though it cannot be argued that capitalism has an advantage in the inequality that exists, if we don’t have money and think that we can’t do anything, so we don’t do anything, we have to think carefully. Even without money, we can be oppressed by “money”, so why can’t money solve the problem?

Note: It is strange, but I can’t remember clearly where the story at the beginning happened and who it happened to. I only vaguely remember that it was a meeting of some kind, and the speaker was older in both age and status at that time (I often work in this environment). I admit that the first time I heard that sentence with a confident attitude, I was pretty shocked and irritated, but in the end, the matter in the meeting did have a good solution when I changed my mind to a “possible” angle first.

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์

วันพุธที่ 11 ธันวาคม พ.ศ. 2567

Capitalism and baby formula…

 


A young mother who lost her job and was struggling asked for donations of school milk from those who had leftovers or whose children did not drink it in a community Facebook group, hoping to bring it to her young child. Ultimately, this mother’s child might “get more expensive milk than my child or your child!?”


Let me tell you first that this is not a scam on social media. The background is still there…


Since it is a community group, some people want to help. Until a kind-hearted person asked, checked, and went to meet this mother in person with some school milk. So he brought information and photos to help share that this mother is struggling.


When the information became more apparent, people in the group were more interested in helping. And someone noticed that this mother’s child was too young and unsuitable for school milk. She thought she should drink infant formula so the child would have it immediately. This kind-hearted person asked to transfer money to buy it, but it was not convenient to go in person. So, the first person who met this mother volunteered to go and buy it because her house was near the struggling mother. After that, kindness followed. It is another good story in the community where people help each other.


But the point is…


When I first volunteered to handle the matter of buying powdered milk, I explained the receipt for my honesty by buying it at a convenience store because it was quick. I chose the most economical brand. Let’s say it was brand B, which is considered inexpensive, about 300 baht per bag, and is a standard formula*


… We can buy other brands of milk that (seem) more popular, are usually more expensive than brand B, and have a unique formula for less than 300 baht, but we have to buy more.


If we buy a large box of powdered milk at about 1,500 – 2,000 baht, the average per bag is 10-20% cheaper compared to the retail price of 1 bag. Those who can afford it usually choose this way because the child needs to drink milk for several months, which saves thousands of baht. I said the mother’s child might drink more expensive milk…


(*For those who have never had a child or may not know, there are many powdered milk brands for children, and the prices are different, but each brand usually has a standard and unique formula. That is, it contains more additional nutrients. Brand B also has a unique formula; if you buy more, it is cheaper.)


Not wrong, but I can't choose

This may be just one small source and the starting point that makes us reflect on the characteristics of "capitalists" in some aspects. There can continue to be an imbalance or what is called "inequality."


Of course, buying things in convenience stores is more expensive but convenient. Buying fewer items is more expensive. It's normal. There is no right or wrong. It's up to you to "choose."


But if we look a little further, sometimes we "can't choose," and it turns out that people who don't have much already end up having to pay more and get lower quality. How can that be? If they spend all their money on milk, where will they get other expenses?


If we assume (I emphasize that I assume) that special formula milk is really better, that means that children of people without capital will have a disadvantage in development, resulting in less physical capital in the future, whether it's body shape, face, skin, or intelligence, and they will continue to be disadvantaged.


If we can choose, it takes work.

Even if it's just an assumption that good-quality milk affects growth, if you think about it, you will find that the disadvantages in many aspects do not only affect at that time but will continue to be passed on to the future because inequality will only increase, not just in the distance but in many dimensions as well.


For example, people with little capital may breastfeed their children or regular formula milk and try in many ways to grow up to have good knowledge and abilities. During that time, they will have to struggle to support themselves and their families day by day. They will be in a situation with work, children, and many other details. Their mind and spirit must be intense and positive. However, if they try hard until their children grow up to be good at it… until one day they pass the exam for a good faculty, the career that they graduate from should be a career that generates good income. But… the tuition fee for this field of study is also expensive (when they grow up to be good and wise, they still have to rely on scholarships). It becomes a heavier burden, not easier…


When it is like this, for us who have limited capital, we have to decide whether to invest in ourselves to build our status to continue or cut ourselves off and invest in our children. And of course, if we cannot send our children to study, our children may end up having the same capital as ourselves again, in a cycle…


Someone might suddenly think that, well, taking the scholarship exam… seems like a good choice. But sometimes it's funny that let's say, they give three scholarships, and our child gets 4th place, while the 1-3 who get them are children of a wealthy family. (Don't forget that I'm making an assumption, but it's in a real society.)


Thinking positively about inequality is getting harder and harder.


As mentioned, it's just an assumption and it's just one perspective. If you're in the middle to lower class, there might be people who try to inspire you or point out that you have to struggle, be diligent, or be creative to get out of it. It's true and not wrong.


However, escaping from a certain level is like a ladder. In the past, you might have just tried to go up five steps, and it was easier, but now it's ten steps. People must make mistakes and develop to grow, no matter how many steps they take. But it's not everyone who doesn't try.


When it gets more complex every day, there will only be people who are tired, discouraged, give up, or choose to live without struggling, seeking easy happiness, until they may end up in debt or not develop because of their weak mental state. Even though you can't blame anyone, it's not like you want anyone to be stigmatized because they don't want to develop themselves. This may not always be the case.


We often take five steps instead of decreasing; sometimes, those steps increase due to a distorted system. It is becoming harder to think positively about inequality.


We can't help anyone except From…

In the end, we have to help ourselves… It may be the right conclusion, but we can always help ourselves. Are you sure?


One clear example is that humans tend to survive with only essential physical factors, no matter how much the world develops. No one would disagree.


“Hospitals” are also related to the physical factors of all of us, no matter how rich or poor or how much capital we have, because it is difficult to treat ourselves when we become seriously ill. For those who were born at that time or try looking back at old movies, about 30 years ago, the image of a (government) hospital was peaceful, airy, and not crowded. When we cut to the current image, even expensive private hospitals are still crowded with people…


While government hospitals are getting more crowded, private hospitals are getting more expensive. The strange thing is that, in reality, they are so expensive that few people can afford them. Try not having insurance… and see that there is no sign that the price will decrease, which is their right in the capitalist world…


Whether people are rich or poor, when they are sick, it is a loss because they cannot work, and it becomes a matter of spending money. However, the chances of getting better, getting better, and getting better quickly are different.


Our choices when we are sick are: Difficult to treat due to crowdedness in government hospitals or “buy insurance” unless you can’t buy it or can’t afford it, and that’s it.


But paying for insurance alone may have to endure it, and don’t forget that long-term commitments you can’t pay for along the way will result in huge losses. Plus, health insurance, if there are three people in a family—a father, a mother, and children—and it covers enough to be treated in private hospitals, it will definitely be almost 100,000 baht per year. It is considered a large amount of money, and many health insurance companies do not give refunds because it is not a deposit…


The last option is to take a chance. When you get sick, you have to pay for private treatment yourself…


This is the only example related to inequality today. Looking to the future, no matter how you look at it, government hospitals will have a hard time growing. The problem will gradually worsen unless there are new policies that can be implemented in many ways and must be implemented in the long term, which is something that “we can’t do ourselves” and can’t help anyone. It’s also challenging to allow ourselves…


Is capitalism wrong?

This article may seem long, but it is very short compared to the origin or actual results from today to the future. It is also not well written because it still needs many dimensions. In part, am I attacking “capitalism”? The answer is no because this is just a story, a tale, and a perspective.


Capitalism is no different from many things. It is just a system, a process with advantages, no different from many things that are “good, but it depends on how you use it” and “can you control its disadvantages?” The important thing is that “we cannot do it ourselves,” but it significantly impacts our lives.


For example, the previous example from the hospital reflects more clearly that during this severe COVID period, there is a shortage of beds. Still, if you can pay or have private insurance, there will be plenty of beds. The question is, are the hospitals at fault? Are people with insurance at fault? The answer is no because they do business honestly. However, as long as we have a system, but those who should use it do not use it or do not know how to use it, they can only look and think to themselves…


Or, in the case of the “convenience store barbecue sauce drama,” this story sometimes just happens to be news because the other party is not just a small retailer. The question is, are the (larger) ones at fault? If we talk about the existing standards and criteria, it's not illegal; it can be done. Free capitalism...


Sometimes, the words "full cycle" and "monopoly" are a bit shady, or "doing from the upstream, downstream" and "I will control the river" are hard to interpret because the issue of "monopoly" in the world still has many unsolvable problems. That is another aspect of economics, business.


From the beginning, what I have written started from something close to us and expanded to us. In the end, it means organizations. The big ones will be bigger and have more channels, and the small ones will be smaller. There are more obstacles, and the channels are narrower. The difficulties will come back to us and ourselves.


Finally, I don't know how the unemployed mother is, but I will tell you more information about the story of the mother, which happened shortly before the COVID crisis. The people who used to help the mother may have a more challenging time today...

Read more แทงบอลออนไลน์